WW3 latest: Tensions breakout over hotly disputed India-China border | World | News

Soldiers from the two nations clashed again on May 5. The events took place in Pangong Tso lake in Ladakh, which straddles the border. According to Foreign Policy, the dispute came as the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China objected to Indian military patrols in the area, following differing assessments on the de facto international border.

On May 9, soldiers from both countries came to blow and threw stones at each other at an altitude of 15,000 feet.

The area borders the Indian northeastern state of Sikkim and the Tibet Autonomous Region of China.

It is believed the PLA wished for Indian patrols to retreat.

No arms were raised, but several injuries were reported with one Indian officer requiring an airlift to hospital.

New Delhi believes Chinese troops entered Indian territory a total of 1,025 times between 2016 and 2018.

2017 saw a two-month long border dispute which led to renewed fears of conflict.

China attempted to construct a road at Doklam, a site which straddles across India, Bhutan and China.

On behalf of Bhutan, India entered the zone with 270 troops armed with weapons and two bulldozers to stop the construction of the road.

READ MORE: World War 3: India and Pakistan ‘complacent’ about nuclear war risk

According to the World Bank, both nations were at the time on similar economic footing.

That year, Indian GDP was $297billion (£244billion) while China’s was $312billion (£256billion).

Defence spending was $10.6billion (£8.7billion) in New Delhi and $11.4billion (£9.4billion) in Beijing.

In 2018, however, Indian GDP was $2.7trillion (£2.2trillion), whilst China’s was $9.8trillion (£7.3trillion).

Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian external affairs minister told India Today: “We have what is a very complex relationship with China.

“[It] has been managed reasonably well.

“Because China’s capability has grown, its ambitions have grown, its influence has grown. First of all, let’s recognise that these are not issues that are going to be amenable to easy and ready solutions. If there were, previous governments and previous diplomats would have solved it.

“The second issue which you have to look at is, recognising that these are complex issues, do you then deal more with China or less with China? At a higher level with China, or at a lower level with China? Deal more intensively and more open-mindedly with China, or not? I would put it to you that precisely because the issues are so serious and so complex, it’s important to have a very high level communication.

“And so, in 2017, this suggestion came from us, saying You are a rising power, weare a rising power, our relationship with the rest of the world is going to be different, our relationship with each other will be different. So if we don’t communicate in a very honest manner with each other, it’s not good for either of us.”

Source link